Sign up for Executive Dysfunction, a newsletter that highlights one under-the-radar story each week about how Trump is changing the law—or how the law is pushing back. You’ll also receive updates on the latest from Slate’s Jurisprudence team.
On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard argument in two cases about when the president can target private attorneys. The cases stemmed from President Donald Trump’s executive orders last year singling out specific law firms and lawyers that the president claimed posed a national security risk. But the arguments revealed how Trump’s actions were nothing more than retaliation and censorship for anyone who dares to represent Democrats in court or challenge the administration’s policies. During the oral arguments, the Department of Justice even conceded that its position would allow the government to single out any law firm, nonprofit, or individual in the country—for not just politics but even religion or race. This is plainly unconstitutional, and the D.C. Circuit judges were having none of it.
It’s no secret that candidate Trump came into the office with an eye toward using the government’s power to attack his political enemies. By some counts, he made hundreds of threats against everyone from rival politicians to reporters to judges. But one lesser-covered target of his ire have been the lawyers who have represented those political opponents. In March 2025, the White House released a series of executive orders with ominous and targeted titles, like “Addressing Risks From WilmerHale.” The orders zeroed in on specific law firms that engaged in activity the president claimed was unfair to him. For example, WilmerHale, a large law firm on the East Coast, had hired Bush-nominated FBI director Robert Mueller, whom Trump despises for his work as special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Mueller’s associate Andrew Weissmann went on to a position at a different law firm, Jenner & Block, which also got hit with an executive order.
The orders against these firms imposed similar punishments. They revoked security clearances for their attorneys. Although many people with security clearances are government employees, millions of private citizens also need clearances to work on military matters or to represent criminal defendants charged with crimes that implicate sensitive information. Thus, these firms’ businesses would be seriously affected by a lack of clearance. The orders also reduced access to government buildings, threatened the cancellation of contracts associated with the firms, and triggered the launching of employment discrimination investigations into some of the firms’ diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
Or at least the orders tried to do all those things. Lawsuits challenging the orders arrived quickly in the D.C. federal district court….
Read More: The DOJ makes a shocking confession about a terrible Trump executive order.
