Close Menu
  • Home
  • Markets
    • Earnings
  • Banks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
  • Business
    • Retail
  • industry
    • Finance
    • Energy
    • Real Estate
  • Politics
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Facebook LinkedIn
Financial Market News
Subscribe Now
  • Home
  • Markets
    • Earnings
  • Banks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
  • Business
    • Retail
  • industry
    • Finance
    • Energy
    • Real Estate
  • Politics
Financial Market News
You are at:Home»Investing»Ford’s “Most Radical Change” Was Supposed to Reduce Costs. What if It Does
Investing

Ford’s “Most Radical Change” Was Supposed to Reduce Costs. What if It Does

March 28, 20263 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
OLOGI Ad 2


Unintended consequences, especially in business, can be painful lessons to learn. A recent unrelated example was Major League Baseball introducing a pitch clock to improve the speed of the game — it worked well and improved the game, by most accounts. However, the reduced overall game time and the shorter downtime gave fans less time to buy valuable products such as beer, food, and novelties, which is a big moneymaker. Ford Motor Company (F 1.98%) could find itself looking at unintended consequences as it begins its radical production change.

This is the way

More than a century after Ford pioneered the moving assembly line, current CEO Jim Farley thinks the automaker has yet again found a better way of making vehicles. While Ford’s Universal EV Production System, and its developing “assembly tree” process, isn’t the first time the process has been considered — Tesla touted a similar thought process years ago — it has the potential to accelerate Ford into the front of the pack in the race against Chinese competitors for cheaper vehicles and more efficient manufacturing.

“It gets Ford into the game,” Sam Abuelsamid, vice president of market research at Telemetry, told Automotive News. “I’m not aware of any other legacy automaker that is going down this path to this degree yet — certainly not GM and Stellantis. If they execute this properly, they’re back among the leading pack.”

A person presents Ford's Universal EV Platform to an audience.

Image source: Ford Motor Company.

The process essentially adjusts a linear vehicle production line in favor of three simultaneous subassemblies. Larger aluminum castings and the battery get joined together later, and the process ultimately generates fewer but larger parts, more efficient workstations, and faster production times. Let’s take a second to raise some questions for investors.

Ford Motor Company Stock Quote

Today’s Change

(-1.98%) $-0.23

Current Price

$11.37

Key Data Points

Market Cap

$45B

Day’s Range

$11.29 – $11.55

52wk Range

$8.44 – $14.79

Volume

33M

Avg Vol

65M

Gross Margin

6.52%

Dividend Yield

5.28%

Unintended consequences?

Starting with Ford’s upcoming $30,000 midsize electric pickup in 2027, the automaker will replace hundreds of smaller components with two large aluminum “unicastings” — think the front and/or rear of the vehicle in one piece. While the positives of this production evolution are fairly apparent, it raises questions for repairability.

Ford had to ask itself honestly if consumer repair bills would skyrocket if collision centers had to replace a damaged piece that was one big chunk of the car, rather than a smaller piece, as in previous production scenarios. Not only would higher repair costs be something for consumers to consider, but the impact could be greater in Ford’s prized Ford Pro commercial business, where decisions for large fleet orders hang in the balance of cost variables such as this. While research is in the early stages, so far it has shown that vehicles with large castings can actually be less expensive to fix, provided the vehicles had been designed with…



Read More: Ford’s “Most Radical Change” Was Supposed to Reduce Costs. What if It Does

TGC Banner 1
change costs Fords radical reduce Supposed
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleCLARITY Act Nears Finish Line, but Industry Support Remains Key, Says Tim
Next Article Wall Street marks its worst week since start of conflict in Iran

Related Posts

Earnings call transcript: Nortech Systems shows resilience in Q4 2025

March 27, 2026

5 ways Amazon is investing in Texas

March 26, 2026

Citigroup’s Co-Head of Asia Investment Banking Metzger Departs

March 25, 2026

Fonix announces share buyback of up to 230,000 shares

March 25, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Energy News

What the Energy Industry Is (and Isn’t) Saying About the War in Iran

Trump says Iran let 10 oil ships through Strait of Hormuz as ‘present’

Former defence leaders outline already-present fossil fuel dependence,

Kuwait says Hormuz closure will trigger domino effect across the world

Banks News

CLARITY Act Nears Finish Line, but Industry Support Remains Key, Says Tim

Big banks take heat at Senate hearing

Ombudsman Remulla cites ‘problem’ with AMLC amid flood mess probe

Market structure bill compromise draws wide-ranging reaction from fractured

Real Estate News

The Condo Market Is Showing Signs of Recovery. What Potential Buyers Should

War with Iran burdens North Texas housing market as mortgage rates rise

The ‘primary barrier’ to this spring’s homebuying season

A tale of two countries

© 2026 finmar.news

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.